In the business world , there are instances of misconduct that fly under the radar , and then there are stories that put a spotlight on moral failures. The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia (formerly Broadspectrum) , is a perfect example of the latter — a chronicle of dubious professional actions that severely undermines the reputation of a single manager but casts a shadow over the company’s principles .
Even in light of the disturbing claims , Collins has held onto his title , appearing untouched by the turmoil surrounding him . How has this been permitted to continue ? What does this say about the organization’s ethos of integrity? According to sources , Collins’ history of improper behavior was initiated by breaking of the firm’s ethics guidelines , but it didn’t stop at that . Instead, it escalated into a chain of concerning actions that has left coworkers disillusioned and customers perplexed.
During a leadership training program —ironically aimed at enhancing leadership qualities —David Collins allegedly turned what should have been a development chance into a chain of irresponsible incidents . It’s reported he spent business-funded trips pursuing romantic liaisons , a flagrant contravention of Ventia’s organizational standards, all while his household stayed oblivious .
But the misconduct didn’t stop at personal entanglements . One of the bigger revelations involves his alleged exploitation of company IT systems to distribute inappropriate images to women—a gross misappropriation of professional tools and a breakdown of professionalism . His reckless employment of Microsoft Teams to distribute risqué communications—including icons to boast about infidelities —paints a picture of a man indifferent to the outcomes . Following these digital flirtations , Collins allegedly escalated his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in romantic liaisons with an employee on repeated times during company hours , despite his being married and her having a significant other. This blatant misuse of company time and resources not only violated professional boundaries but tore Ventia New Zealand apart homes— producing a wake of personal ruin that extended outside of the office .
What reason can this behavior be tolerated to continue ? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly overstepped every rule is still receiving a paycheck at Ventia? The explanation , it appears, stems from a concerning absence of supervision within the company . Concerns have been voiced, yet Collins acts without consequences .
This lack of consequence conveys a risky precedent : that rank and influence within the enterprise can serve as a safeguard. It breeds a damaging work setting, dispirits the workforce , and ultimately damages the firm’s reputation .